The recent developments in Vietnam's economy have raised alarms as the country witnesses a significant downturn, with export values plummeting by approximately 165 billion yuan, marking the steepest decline since 2014. This unexpected collapse has led many to question the previous buoyant rhetoric and the strategies that have dominated the landscape in recent years. What has led to this dramatic shift, and could it be the result of Vietnam’s unyielding attempts to align itself closely with the United States?

As the old adage suggests, it's not about who laughs first, but rather about who can sustain their laughter in the end. Vietnam, once touted as a potential successor to China in terms of manufacturing prowess, is now caught in a whirlwind of economic turmoil. The nation's attempts to remedy the crisis have included lowering interest rates, a move that seems counterintuitive given that the U.S. is on a trajectory of raising rates.

The economic metrics tell a concerning story. According to the General Statistics Office of Vietnam, July saw a decline of 3.5% in exports, contributing to five consecutive months of falling export figures - the longest such slump in 14 years. In the first seven months of the year, Vietnam's exports shrank by 10.6% compared to the same period in the previous year, amounting to an alarming decrease of about $23 billion. This trend has forced a substantial number of Vietnamese companies to cease operations, exacerbating the employment crisis. Reports indicate that over 60,000 firms temporarily shut down in the first half of 2023 alone, representing an 18.2% increase from the previous year.

Advertisement

The figures surrounding Vietnam's economy in the previous year create a stark contrast to the current reality. In 2022, the GDP of Vietnam rose by 8.02%, a record growth that seemed to herald a new era for the nation. Many observers’ve been left wondering how Vietnam, buoyed by U.S. support and foreign investments, could have experienced such a quick economic reversal. It raises the pertinent question: How did things change so dramatically?

Since 2019, the U.S. initiated numerous trade restrictions against China, thereby rerouting production investments to Vietnam. With a concerted effort to build Vietnam into a robust manufacturing alternative to China, companies like Foxconn, Samsung, and Apple flocked to the country. This influx was critical, leading Vietnam's foreign trade to reach staggering heights. In 2022, Vietnam's total trade value surpassed $700 billion for the first time, marking a 9.5% increase from the previous year. Yet, while Vietnam basked in this newfound economic prosperity, there were underlying concerns lurking beneath the surface.

While the total trade stood at an impressive $732.5 billion, the country's GDP was significantly lower, at only $408.8 billion, translating to an export dependency rate of approximately 180%. In stark comparison, China's export dependency sits at only 34%. This disparity implies that, despite Vietnam’s substantial export figures, the profits generated from these exports are relatively modest. The fundamental issue lies in the fact that Vietnam lacks a comprehensive industrial system; many of the foreign firms that have set up shop are essentially assembly plants. Significant components and raw materials still need to be imported from China, diminishing the potential profit margins and showcasing the fragility of Vietnam’s economic structure.

For instance, a smartphone produced in Vietnam might only come from assembly operations, whereas a similar product manufactured in China is interlinked with an expansive network of around 672 upstream and downstream suppliers. This dependency illustrates a crucial aspect of manufacturing prowess: without a solid foundation, any perceived growth is ultimately at risk.

As the global financial environment continues shifting—primarily due to the U.S. Federal Reserve's decisions—Vietnam’s reliance on exports and its lack of a sturdy industrial backbone place it in a precarious position. The rising U.S. dollar and its implications for international trade create even further vulnerabilities. When the Fed raises interest rates, the repercussions are felt far and wide, especially in economies that have based their growth on rapid foreign investment and export maximization.

Recent reports suggest that nearly $250 trillion Vietnamese dong has fled the stock and housing markets. The potential fallout such a mass withdrawal could have on manufacturing and economic stability is enormous. This situation can be likened to Japan’s experience post-World War II, where the desire for foreign investment led to lax monetary policies. The eventual outcome was a prolonged period of economic stagnation following market collapses—an echo that Vietnam must heed.

The core of this issue can be explained through the lens of the Mundell-Fleming model—an economic theory indicating that a country cannot simultaneously maintain a fixed exchange rate, free capital movement, and independent monetary policy. Currently, Vietnam appears to be adopting a mixture of policies that risk undermining its economic stability. The attractiveness of free capital flow has allowed for easy entry of foreign investment. However, the interconnectedness of global markets means that once the U.S. begins tightening its monetary policies, capital fleeing to safer bet locations poses a significant risk to emerging economies like Vietnam.

In summary, while Vietnam has taken steps to emulate aspects of China's economic success, it lacks a critical internal market and robust foundations to sustain its growth. As China’s vast domestic market continues driving its economy, Vietnam's dependence on external trade becomes its Achilles' heel, particularly in times of global economic tightening. The lesson here is a stark reminder: relying solely on external conditions without fostering internal stability leads to precarious economic landscapes. As it stands, the future for Vietnam looks uncertain amidst its reliance on delicate international ties and export market vulnerability.

In conclusion, Vietnam's current plight is emblematic of the broader struggles facing many emerging economies that aim to rapidly industrialize without establishing the requisite structural integrity. As the world continues to navigate post-pandemic challenges, Vietnam’s experience serves as a cautionary tale: it is essential to build resilient economies that are less susceptible to the winds of external change.